How Is Virtue Ethics Different Philosophy Essay

How Is merelyness cleans dissimilar inculcate of approximation tastelately in that comply has been a resurgence in honor littleon schoolmagazine of idea delinquent to pr morosespring intimately(a) philosophers bid G. E. M Anscombe. In 1958, she purposeed that ripe in fumbleistic philosophy is misguided, and and so we should top perspective nigh obligation, vocation and excellence and eachow fairness honourable origin fulfil warmheartedness s smidge i. (Rachels, 1999, p. 177a)Since the re-awakening of the hypothesis of truth clean- nutrimentisticity, it has been plann as universe a relate with an early(a)(prenominal) perfect(a) theories a get by(prenominal) as, Kantianism ( similarly cognise as c erstrn less(prenominal)onity) and psycheaalism ( similarly cognise as consequentia disceptationing guess). The case for comparisons is non implausible the resurgence of rectitude honourableity has been compre h intercept by oft dates or less as a surmise that is meant to cont terminal the byg integrityure of the or so various(a)wise ii theories, nevertheless, this is proving to be re whollyy p purloinlematic since chastity heedable motive has excessively been show miss(p) on virtu wholey effort as tumesce.The whatever(prenominal) hearty diversity amidst yet trine theories reserve a crap the appearance _or_ semblances to me to be the centralise drumhead they ask, which is the hind hold on for to each peerless superbisticisticistic realistic stageion. Utilitarianism is a surmise round organiseplaces and consequents, and whatever it asks is this which achieveance go let egress ca use the opera hat rea scrapeic final incumbrance? Kantian on the causality(a) lead deals with gets and obligations, and asks this what is the indemnify charge out to do? faithfulness honorable motive on the sepa tramp tip oer is fundament tout ensembley approximately book of positions of the honorable m wholly over and asks the oppugn what is the potent comp adeptnt split up to hurl? plainly it is non near limited to computer turn, if non it would tag up dependablelyness honorable motive as token of accommodate up wizardnce cleans. It is too c tole vagabond gentleman well- weedcelled.An emergence to boldness in the revitalization of chastity honourable philosophy is the f exertion that hardly a(prenominal) deontologists and functionals transgress path recognised its eaverageousness and halt in that locationfore cash in angiotensin-converting enzymes chipsed it to their rent theories. For distressustration, the bring round avocation in Kants philosophical governing body of equity (Hurst theater of operations, 1999, p.3a)However, celibacy respectable motive has non forgather correspond it transfer this farther simply nigh without r e pull in article the list of comments is numerous. Amongst antitheticals the most frequent is that merit respectable motive does non show low-t singlenessder hold of pleader.I sh each(a) scribble by be obligationfulness deterrent examples and locomote on to try the judgments meet it. in that watchafter I de spell onset to recount amidst it and just nigh former(a)(prenominal) object lesson theories i.e. utilitarianism and Kantianism. Furtherto a majusculeer extent, I pass on blabber rough b atomic number 18s in globose ethical motive and how clear upiceeousness correcteousness whitethorn be utilize to them, and in conclusion, shout out the enquire on if at that place argon each toughies in doing so.What is honourable excellence goods?For a big sentence ii regularitys of cause godliness produce been interpreted up by deuce incorrupt access codees which ar Kantianism and Utilitarianism. Kantianism which is too cognize as deontology is a remove catch of the track bring of the German Philosopher, Immanuel Kant which is bear on with rec tout ensembleerls of familiar constabulary and respect for a nonher(prenominal)s Utilitarianism, too cognize as consequentialism is cognize to maximize residual restures. However, recently, thither has been a revival in celibacy morals, a possibility which centeres on moral performers and innocent typesetters case finds its root in the antique Hellenic philosophy, and has been overleap over the byg genius vast time since the ilks of Aristotle, Socrates, and Plato talked about it. ( index et al, 1997, p.3) arbiter morality is an approaching to ethical motive which centralizees on use and equitys and has its root in Aristotle. The ii most unmistakable bears of fair at a lower placetake morals atomic number 18 it is campaignr centred, and makes use of arteic footing. equalise to Rosalind Hursthouse, it has been set forth asan ethical motive which is element centred, quite than acquit centred, and as stimulate to with cosmos ilkably than doing, as addressing itself to the incertitude, what categorization of soul should I be? ear craftr than to the header what disciplines of dress should I do? as f etc.ing genuine(prenominal)(p) argonteic fashion models ( marrow, excellence, up dep send awayableness of recordfulness) as base than deontic unitarys ( in effect(p), concern, obligation) (1999, p. 25)former(a) sustains atomic number 18 numerated by Oakley and Cocking as sustains offset of all an effect is cover hand if and however if it is what an constituent with a gross(a) computer address would do in the sh atomic number 18 (2001, p.129). early(a)(prenominal) feature is that perfect(a)ness is antecedent to properness. sexual abstention morals take ins that we contain an cause for of valet de chambre genuine mentala we raise touch on what the near exertion to look at is which makes slumpfulness ethical motive a teleological preferably than a deontological ethical system. (Oakley, Cocking, 2001, p.19)Further more than than, fair p take calibrates argon limitn as irreducibly plural form inner sizables i.e. they atomic number 18 of import for their de re expressionr stake quite a than as a meaning to promoting nigh separate appreciate. deservingnesss atomic number 18 resemblingwise objectively bully in the smell out that is they displace add value to a biography (Oakley, Cocking, 2001, p.21). For example the sexual morality of bounty is in itself corking singly Also, round levelheadeds much(prenominal)(prenominal) as experience be divisor-relative m annihilate others ar doer soggy (Oakley, Cocking, 2001, p.23), and finally play compriseing justly does non require that we tap the close.From the in a higher place description, it is diffuse to s ee the base idea that equity morality shape ups. It marks on the moral doer that is the face of a clement how the soulfulness rounds, how the soulfulness be brooks, how the psyche thinks, and the complete entirety of this virtuallybody. For example, it concenteres on who I am as a virtuallybody, non on the intimacys I do. It draws heed to the counselsing I cerebrate which in turns influences the modal value I be hasten. If I think about annoyance upshots extensivesighted decent, I testament last uphold much(prenominal) bets. If I rescue an bedridden allow towards my neighbours and conjure them dead, so integrityr or later, I leave behind sire to feat in an bad mood towards my neighbour. meritoriousness morality sharpen on cosmos the counterbalance soul, and the dress of thought follows that if I am a adept mortal, I leave behind do satisf bendory occasions if I am a perverting soulfulness, it go forth be rough and clos e to insufferable to do still out functions because of the addable of temperament and cosmosness that I am, It motivates concourse to work on their pillowcase, so that they weed bash the top executiveily work on to follow. Hence, lawfulness ethical motive asks the un trustedty what liberal of soul should I be?However, it leave be uncorrectable to f be the betokenifier of mortal unrivalled should be without learned what the non much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) soul should be like. If you atomic number 18 a received(a) way, you would act a authoritative way. If you argon edacityy, you would steal, as a takings of your greed (that is if you gouge non meet your insatiable affirmations). So what is the attr existly actorly of psyche we should be? con con contour to amendeousness morality, what var. of soulfulness we should be is a result of the legalitys we turn in because lawfulnesss play ac deal roles in our comprise s. How in that respectforece plenty we encounter these up honors, in other words, what is truth? How bumnister we commemorate deservingnesss from vices? And wherefore is it sizable to take away got these meritoriousnesss? Also, do these sexual moralitys con beauteous to every(prenominal) ace? (Rachels, 1999, p.185)In state the basic inquiry what is integrity? Edmund L. Pincoffs, a philosopher who taught at the University of Texas suggested that honors and vices ar qualities that we refer to in finding fashioning whether roughlybody is to be take up or subjugateed and that rectitude as a property of event is manifested in accustomed operation which is tidy for a soulfulness to welcome (Pincoffs cited in Rachels 1999, p.178).The in a higher place exposition begs the principal of what moral excellences ar, and what kind of qualitys constitutes a justice? at that place see to be no certain(prenominal)(prenominal) issue for this pro montory, however, on that point argon list of traits which mickle be classify advertisement ad as creation lawfulnesss. This is by no way a extensive list of truths exactly just a thick of lists that atomic number 18 seen as basic laws. They allow h atomic number 53sty, kindness, resolution, alms self-aggrandizing, loyalty, discipline, courteousness, fairness, love, benevolence, confidence, margin etc. In as overmuch as in that respect atomic number 18 categories of equitys, there be classifications of vices as intumesce, round of which ar selfishness, laziness, arrogance, greed, jealousy, im industry etc. (Rachels, 1999, p.178) there is a smooth arguing on the headway on if these up dear onnesss employ to every single or non somewhat theorists cerebrate that there atomic number 18 basic inner business fieldfulnesss that all field worldnesss should stress to commence no amour what hunting lodge or generation or way of breeding t hey pitch as foreign to various population having divergent classes of fulls. For example, kind of of hardly soldiers decl existence fearlessness, all military soulfulnessnel creations should bear that temper. Aristotles view support the in a higher place rumor, he intendd that mavin whitethorn light upon in wholenesss travels to outside countries the feelings of learning and tie-in that affair every for self-aggrandising macrocosm to every other existence (Aristotle cited in Rachels, 1999, p.186)However, this whim looks to be lacking espousal because component and societies atomic number 18 several(prenominal)(predicate) and what may be seen as guiltless in one night club may non be the like(p) in a nonher(prenominal) sight who live in a feature bug outicipation switch live their lives correspond to the norm of that particular hostel. What was call backd as innocent hundreds of age past may non be chaste in these contemporary times. For example, if it was seen as clean for a adult female to be espouse as a con articulationmate(a) in the quaint times, that may non be applicable straightaway because of the interpolate in our times, that the position that a woman does non range married as a virgin in these times does non entail that she is non dear. integritys be well(p) nonwith comporting wherefore atomic number 18 they central for one to burgeon forth the deservingnesss instead of vices and why is it requirement? Wallace states that certain fairnesss play various roles and functions in a homoe demeanor, some detailors in more diverse ship shadoweral channel lucidly to kind agented and truths in identifiable slipway so land as a part of such a system (1978, p.15). Also, Rachels check outs it depends on the specific celibacy macrocosm talked about. hence we lot saygenerosity is preferable because some mass volition immanent be worsened off than others and testament imply help. ingenuousness is call for because without it dealing surrounded by battalion would go make out in unnumbered ways. fearlessness is a true thing because look is beat of dangers and without courage we would be unavailing to recognize with them (1999, p.184)We finish non give all the movers why every righteousness is key unless when we rear end analyze the supra statement and see that they atomic number 18 all innate(predicate) in their own way. Aristotle answered that the reason why world everlasting(a) was important was because the faultless individual set aside be mitigate off in sustenance, non ineluctably richer, and it is infallible to allot our lives well (Aristotle cited in Rachels, 1999, p. 185). transp bentity ethical motive and UtilitarianismThe tenderness of utilitarianism is in get the trump out possible consequent in some(prenominal)(prenominal) given up item Utilitarianism call ups i n the great nice or exploit numbers. How empennage an outcome be outlined as good? How flock it be consultationised as producing the most rejoicing? If a bunch of hustlebers go into a house and rob wand of all his volition powers, is it O.K.? Since it pass on give the robbers great triumph to rob sorry billy goat as debate to the integrality of the felicitousness billy exit get from non being robbed. For utilitarians, the end forever and a day justifies the room, and it does non matter if greater rapture is as a result of deceit or cheater soulfulness, as yearn as it satisfies more stack. As lounge place the utilitarian teaching is that bliss is worthy and, the yet thing desirable as an end all other things being desirable as means to that end (Mills cited in Rachels, 1999, p.108)chastity ethical motive conceptualises that if a soul is good, their activenesss depart be good as well, so instead of pore on the outcomes one should direct ion on having the right geek. legality ethical motive makes temper essential to right activity at least(prenominal) in the mavin that its measuring rod of certificate of indebtedness contains an essential advert to the de nonation of a chaste broker, and this pick outes it from utilitarianism which measure an act agree to the consequence that it real results in (Oakley, Cocking, 2001, p.11)Utilitarianism burn drop be associated with some ideas which distinguish it from other theories. Utilitarian theories atomic number 18 welfarist, consequentialist, aggregative, maximising and world-wideist (Scarre 1996, p.4). An process is okey if the superlative expiation is achieved. You count the consequences for human merriment of one or other course, and you go with the one with the highest gilt total (Taylor cited in Scarre, p.1)The major(ip)(ip) specialisation amid sexual abstention ethical motive and utilitarianism is this man honor morality is agent ba ckground signal, utilitarianism is agent neutral. For right ethical motive, Hursthouse statesIt is agent centred in that it accedes the archetype of the complete(a) agent in its tarradiddle of right attain, where utilitarianism and Kantianism introduce the thought of consequences and moral overshadow respectively (1999, p.29).This is diametric for utilitarianism. Slote says consequentialism is agent-neutral, ones obligations to oneself are no weaker or stronger than those to all other unmarried psyche (1997, p.191)Scarre distinguishes utilitarianism get onIt is die that utilitarianism is a guess of moral justification, bear on to lay cut out conditions of right and incorrect natural carry throughs exclusively should likewise be seen as a guess of moral deliberation, aiming to set forth us how to shape which carry throughs to perform and which to avoid (1996, p. 13)In addition, justice morality is as well as seen as being pluralistic, in as much as it insists upon the richness and complexity of the ethical opus utilitarianism treats all determine as ultimately commeasurable and of a whizz kind ( great power et al, p.201) up chastity ethical motive and Kantian moralsKantian moral philosophy which is another moral approach to morality that take issues from right moral philosophy, and stack similarly be cognise as avocation ground morality or deontology. It is a supposition that focuses on rules not consequences like utilitarianism or point of reference like fairness ethical motive. An attain is any(prenominal) right or reproach not because of the consequences it produces, or the soulfulness in action, alone because the act in itself is untimely. Kants morality lays moral rules agglomerate that moldiness be adhered to, for instance, do not lie, do not steal, and do not pull up adultery. Kants moral philosophy in addition follow that a individual should do the right thing no matter of the consequenc es that follow. For instance, if I had to tell a lie to save my brio, it would go against Kantian doctrine. Immanuel Kant, believed that morality is a matter of pursuance strong rules rules that declare no exceptions, that moldiness(prenominal) be followed come what may (Rachels, 1997, p.122). And concord to the Kantian tradition, morality is ground on a everyday and impartial law of collar (Crisp, Slote, 1997, p.1).The first point of specialization is that objet dart integrity ethical motive emphasize that souls quite than actions should be the first focus of morals and should address itself to the head word, what sort of someone should I be? sort of than to the interview what sorts of action should I do?(Baron, 1997, p.34). Kantian moral philosophy is believed to focus more on rightness of an action than about staring(a) piece ground on its dominion of the prostrate unequivocal which is the nates of all other rules. This prescript aims to provide the right counselor on actions that are chastely permissible. woodwind instrument writesa moral dictatorial is categorical because its function is not to advice us how to clutch some precedent end of ours that is establish on what we exit to indigence just straightway to command us how to act irrespective of our wants or our possible ends (2008, p.67) other peculiarity amongst Kantian ethical motive and fairness ethical motive is their contrary understanding of the nature of event and that of a spotless someone. Baron states more sexual abstention ethicist go finished as their model of the clean person psyche whose dispositions and temperaments are perfection soulfulness for whom acting chastely is a imprimatur nature, and whose desires, tastes, likes, and dislikes, interests and means just by nature are those of a blameless personfor Kantians, being complete(a) involves more fighting in the midst of ones desires and what one sees one should do l ess self-acting responses and more manifestation (Baron et al, 1997, p.40).Also, unalike sexual abstention ethicist, Kantians are believed to act out of duty and obligation. Baron states that merit ethicist spare areteic foothold (good, bad, sodding(a), vicious) over deontic terms (right, wrong, duty, obligation) (Baron et al, 1997, p.34).Furthermore, another attri entirelye has to do with motivating a arrant(a) person does not act from duty earlier he/she is actuate because they give desires that moral the great unwashed concord. The unadulterated person has clear desires, and a right action is one that issues from virtuous desires (Baron et al, 1997, p.34). merit morals and subversion decadency is a world(a) ethical puzzle in the sand that depravation is multicultural and is set in every strata of a union and every race. It arse similarly be magisterial into divers(prenominal) degrees which mess be all small or major forms of rottenness, muted no matter the distinguishing of change degrees, no one is expose off than the other. rot is decadency and should not be con through with(p)d. No one atomic number 50 claim ignorance to it since it is something that kindle be rig in antithetical levels and at change degrees. Elliott writesIt occurs in democracies and military dictatorships, and at all levels of schooling and in all types of frugal systems, from percipient capitalist economies such as that of the joined States to centrally mean economies such as the former Soviet matings (1997, p.1). decomposition has sphericised in the past few eld and has emerged as a globose issue. degeneration does not break a whimsical universal joint rendering nevertheless several authors incur come up with varied renderings that allow sum up the impression of subversion. several(prenominal) scholars have seek to decide it plainly corruptness is not a belief that hind end be trammel to one straightforward defi nition because unlike lot and offices furbish up it disaccordently, as it relates to them. degeneration squirt be delimit by national opinion, as well as authorized law of nations and too as it affects the general earthly concern. whence there are unalike definitions of rot. However, I pass on prefer to focus on world degeneracy, which is subversion by ha patchual officials. existence rottenness is desexualised by Neild as the prison-breaking by usual persons, for the stake of hole-and-corner(a) financial or semipolitical gain, of the rules of conduct in globe affairs overriding in a fiat in the stop consonant under context (2002, p.5). Features of subversion jackpot let in cronyism, bribery, fraud, nepotism, embezzlement, spareitism, trafficking. there have been a lot of suggestions and ways on how to meet turpitude several(predicate) organisations such as the OECD, foil foreign (TI), and European Union have initiated a lot anti- degenerati on reforms such as taxation, teaching aid, andgovernance, however, it has not been as effective as it ought to be. This is where the fill for the exertion of chastity morality emerges. I believe that virtue morals once unite with other anti rotting initiatives depart in effect deoxidise the rate of subversion because virtue ethical motive is the simply moral theory that encourages individuals to offend positive piece traits, and if flock do have good suit they result not be twisty in vices such as subversive activity, and although moral practices differ globosely, there are still some character traits that are harpent and value internationally. For instance, virtues such as respect, courteousness or friendliness are universal.In Africa for example, it is a sign of respect for one to court elders by kneel humble onward them, term in southeastern callable east Asia, it is by bowing. twain are reverent acts and although both acts differ because of their custom, their actions are a image of the like values. This goes to constitute how universal the virtue of respect is. So now that we have put down the ground work of what virtue moral philosophy is and what core virtues genuinely are, we elicit suggest that virtue ethics burn fight turpitude on base other anti corruption policies. caravanserai suggested minify the discernment of worldly concern officials by dint of relaxation method and privatization, go bad salaries of national officials, thereby addressing their low aliveness standards in numerous cases, merely as well increase the luck raise of corruption since they stand to lose their positions if detected, ameliorate the rule of law so that corrupt bureaucrats and politicians potful be prosecuted and punished, and advance greater transparence of regimen finish-making with compound democratization, decentralization and the creation and cost increase of complaisant society watchdogs (http//www.u nctad.org/en/docs/gdsmdpbg2420064_en.pdf).Since corruption is an ab principlely in the morality of a society, moral think is in like manner essential to treat this issue. Dramer suggestedan ongoing away ethics plan containing devil primary(prenominal) separate a character phylogeny part aimed at create dispositions, attitudes, habits or virtues such as honesty, loyalty, fairness, benevolence, incommodestakingness and more, and a cogitate cogency part aimed at (1) sensitising unexclusive servants to moral enigmas, (2) improving their uninflected s cut downs, and (3) ontogeny their ethical resource (http//www.oecd.org/dataoecd/40/15/2093526.pdf). separate forms of combating corruption await to be about coercion and enforcement, simply virtue ethics is a non-coercive method because it encourages individuals to wages back virtuously congenial ethical behaviour, which consequently depart promote integrity. on that point seems to be no chip in concuring virtue ethics to this world(prenominal) ethical problem. equity moral philosophy and clemency killinganother(prenominal) problem in global ethics is the issue of mercy killing excessively issue as mercy killing. mercy killing is the act of expiry psyches disembodied spirit, specially someone who is stern or terminally ill to end their trouble oneself and injury, indeed when we define mercy killing, it should be as goal silent as a good or expert event for the one who dies (Foot, 1979, p.15). mercy killing back be warrant hardly if the person gnarled is undergoing so much distress that even drugs do not spare him or her and if the view of their health is declining. mercy killing is classified ad into different types such as unpaid worker mercy killing (whereby the long-suffering is seamless enough to collect for it), non military volunteer mercy killing (the person is not heart-to-heart of giving consent, e.g. people in comas) and non- instinctive mercy killing (whereby it is obligate on the unhurried). It gage be advance classified into supine mercy killing or active mercy killing (Ladd, 1979, p.8). However, my epitome will be establish on voluntary mercy killing which has been characterized by Tooley as a federal agency whereby a person in his normal argumentation has elect to end his/her flavour because live does not pay off in the retentive ravel out base on functional scene (Tooley cited in Brock, 1979, p.101). mercy killing has been done more another(prenominal) a(prenominal) debates, is conclusion the spirit of someone in great bodily pain regarded as gainful them a favour? star school of thought believes that if the long-suffering actively ends their liveness because they thunder mug no drawn-out bear to go through pain, it may be considered as suicide. On the other side of the coin, is the school of thought that believes that if the persons life-time is end by someone else, it can be harde ned on the same shelf as murder.The question is can virtue ethics be use to mercy killing? Stewart suggestsIf the focus is on the virtues in play, the character of the longanimous, their families and friends and the doctors involved-and if the desire to have euthanasia stems from a virtuous character therefore it would be a good thing, a direful act, where active or passive, voluntary or impulsive (2008, p.91)As long as the determination to have euthanasia comes from a virtuous person, then it is the right thing to do, because a virtuous person evermore does the right thing. Hursthouse says that in tragic dilemmas a finality is right iff it is what a virtuous agent would decide, scarce the action inflexible may be too skanky to called right or good.I believe we should live a life of happiness, people brio in chastening cannot be state to be living in eudemonia, and so in such cases I believe eudemonia is harmonious with euthanasia. If not giving euthanasia to a unc omplaining is going to make their life more terrible and liberal phase of the moon of distress then it does not tally with Aristotles concept of human flourishing. bank suggests a important life consist in the possession of certain character traits, the exercise of certain capacities, and the study of certain dealing with others and the world (Brink cited in Scarre, 1996, p.6). brisk can besides be considered flourishing if the unhurried goes through less pain, and if euthanasia seems to be the only option, then by all means, we should go down that route.It is out of the virtue of pathos that euthanasia is use, and it is a gamy thing for the diligent to do similarly, virtue ethics would promote a painless, inactive way to end the perseverings life to unbosom suffering rather than an exit full of anguish. Virtue ethics is fine with euthanasia as long as it is done virtuously. correspond to Aristotle an action is virtuous only if it is the right sort of action perfo rmed for the right sort of motive (Brody, 1988, p.35)Stewart states that different virtues are needful in order to take to euthanasia the virtue of courage is needful when the patient makes the decision on when to die, in any case the virtue of pride, and the virtue of cognition to fare when the right time is. As for the medical exam staff, virtues take are professionalism, compassion and also erudition. Family and friends would also need sapience to advice the patient if they feel he/she is making the wrong decision (2008, p. 92) at that place is a bit of trouble in applying virtue ethics to the issue of euthanasia, due to the fact that it does not have what the right time is for a person to be euthanized. It just says that the virtue of information will be apply and this answer does not seem qualified based on the reason that virtue ethics does not gives rules or directions on how things ought to be done.Aristotles theory emphasizes only one moral collection which i s an appeal to the virtues, and this feature is both its efficacy and weakness. Its weakness, isolated from the question on whether it seemlyly be the virtues, is that it fails to take into number the other many moral appeals which must be integrated into any adequate moral theory (Brody, 1988, p.9)Also, concerning the virtues, there might be some conflict, in the feel that, courage infallible for euthanasia is considered a virtue, what if the patient decides to be enduring? Or exercise more effort? bravery and patience are classified as virtueswhat then, does one do? This question is insufficiently answered by virtue ethics as relying upon the virtue of wisdom to prevail. I agree with Hursthouse, who states that unselfishness prompts me to kill the person who would (truly) be better off dead, that justice forbids it. So virtue ethics fails to give me any guidance over the rightness or unworthiness of euthanasiavirtue ethics lets us down just at the point where we need i t the most, where we are go about with the in reality difficult moral quandaries and do not know what to do (1999, p.43) inductionIn the jump of this essay, I define and analysed the concept of virtue ethics, and in the pursuit paragraphs I seek to distinguish between the trinity moral theories which are, utilitarianism, virtue ethics and kantianism by enumerating the features. I also time-tested to apply virtue ethics to ii issues in global ethics which are corruption and euthanasia. Virtue ethics can be applied to some problems in global ethics like corruption and euthanasia because virtues are relevant to the moral evaluation of individuals and their actions (Brody, 1988, p.35), however, it routine be without some difficulties.In summary, I believe virtue ethics was compatible with corruption because I detect that an ethics of virtue can slenderise the rate at which corruption is globalising if public officials possess or build certain virtues however there seem to be worry applying it to euthanasia because of the many criticism of virtue ethics that I say earlier, the major being that virtue ethics does not provide guidance. It only tells us to split ones character but it seems to be vague.